The best movie animations these days model liquid flow but physics, not so much.
There is non-zero drag. My guess is this real effect is likely to derive from Miles Mathis theory. Something like: the hadrons (protons & neutrons) channeling density increases between liquid to solid at the boundary. Which in turn binds the liquid to the solid — just a minuscule force, but concrete & eventually measurable.
This would be the same explanation atmospheres co-rotate – something also unexplained by the mainstream. A topic also not as much about viscosity as they think.
I have no direct quote from Mathis. His post on so-called superfluids may be the closest (in it he rips into the mainstream nonsense on that topic, their claims involving superconductivity & even black holes. As happens so often now with them, verbiage & math ultimately about nothing).
other have pointed this out.
For example, Claes Johnson (CLJ) wrote 2022-11-09 ‘Corruption of Modern Physics 14: Prandtl’s Boundary Layer Theory’ – very abstract, I only scanned it. I quote from it. the following when badly translated explains ‘fluid mechanics from start into a joke’
QUOTE
As noted by Nobel Laureate Hinshelwood, this made fluid mechanics from start into a joke when divided into
- practical fluid mechanics or hydraulics observing phenomena which cannot be explained (non-zero drag)
- theoretical fluid mechanics explaining phenomena which cannot be observed (zero drag).
UNQUOTE
As you can notice, CLJ knows this is a problem for physics. He also knows about other, related, problems the MSM has. For an earlier example, he wrote a long paper he thinks explains Lift by a Wing.
To me the two CLJ explanations (with only a quick glance at each) look as wrong as the mainstream. As just another way-too-abstract theory, that a thinker can get too invested in. But, like I said, at least he can see they have a problem.
carbontater 